<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cynj's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cynj.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cynj.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Diary of a mother with a paedophile neighbour</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on who&#8217;s your neighbour? by Kate</title>
		<link>http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>The British law protects the criminal,we are not allowed to name these perverted freaks.What about our children? It is ok for them to be damaged for life then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British law protects the criminal,we are not allowed to name these perverted freaks.What about our children? It is ok for them to be damaged for life then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on who&#8217;s your neighbour? by JackP</title>
		<link>http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>JackP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Came across this on my old mate Bruce&#039;s site.

Apart from the fact I can&#039;t help feel a bit miffed you&#039;ve given this bloke the same first name as me (most Jacks are lovely, you know!), I do feel for you.

I&#039;m a father of two small children, and I know how I worry about them from time to time even when I don&#039;t have any reason to worry.

I am concerned about their online privacy however, and have recently stopped using their names on my blog (and given time, I&#039;ll do the same with earlier entries) because I don&#039;t want to give people something they can use in an attempt to pretend they know my family for whatever reason.

Something else that caused a slight frisson of worry was when I posted our holiday snaps on flickr. Most of the photos had been viewed about 6-10 times as of now; except for the one called &#039;Boys in the bath&#039; (just a head-and-shoulders shot) which had 40 views.

40? You can&#039;t help but worry. So that photo has been shifted to a friends and family only preference.

I can&#039;t say anything that will improve your situation: all I can say is that you have my sympathy for the situation, and I hope that either you - or he - moves on quickly. 

I would suggest that you be careful about what you&#039;re doing here too: don&#039;t give away identifiable information and so on, &#039;cos it wouldn&#039;t help matters if YOU ended up in trouble either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came across this on my old mate Bruce&#8217;s site.</p>
<p>Apart from the fact I can&#8217;t help feel a bit miffed you&#8217;ve given this bloke the same first name as me (most Jacks are lovely, you know!), I do feel for you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a father of two small children, and I know how I worry about them from time to time even when I don&#8217;t have any reason to worry.</p>
<p>I am concerned about their online privacy however, and have recently stopped using their names on my blog (and given time, I&#8217;ll do the same with earlier entries) because I don&#8217;t want to give people something they can use in an attempt to pretend they know my family for whatever reason.</p>
<p>Something else that caused a slight frisson of worry was when I posted our holiday snaps on flickr. Most of the photos had been viewed about 6-10 times as of now; except for the one called &#8216;Boys in the bath&#8217; (just a head-and-shoulders shot) which had 40 views.</p>
<p>40? You can&#8217;t help but worry. So that photo has been shifted to a friends and family only preference.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t say anything that will improve your situation: all I can say is that you have my sympathy for the situation, and I hope that either you &#8211; or he &#8211; moves on quickly. </p>
<p>I would suggest that you be careful about what you&#8217;re doing here too: don&#8217;t give away identifiable information and so on, &#8216;cos it wouldn&#8217;t help matters if YOU ended up in trouble either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on who&#8217;s your neighbour? by bruce</title>
		<link>http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cynj.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/whos-your-neighbour/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Any more news Cynj?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any more news Cynj?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
